header-logo header-logo

Drawing the line

09 November 2012 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7537 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

How far does the law protect employees from sexual harassment, ask Chris Bryden & Michael Salter

As the maelstrom surrounding Jimmy Savile engulfs the BBC and, if newspapers reports are to be believed, expands to other facets of the public sector, it is useful to consider how much the law has changed over a relatively short period of time and the potential exposure there may be for employers faced with allegations of sexual harassment.

In the employment context, the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) and its predecessor legislation prohibited harassment on grounds of the protected characteristic and, in the case of the Sex Discrimination Act 1976, prohibited sexual harassment which was harassment of a sexual nature and which did not depend on the sex of the victim.

Establishing liability

Recently, in general terms, the law of tort has relaxed considerably the circumstances in which an employer can be liable for the torts of its employees. Gone are the days when an employer would be found not liable for their employee’s acts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Firm grows London practice with two partner promotions

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Government contracts and procurement practice expands with London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll