header-logo header-logo

09 November 2012 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7537 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Drawing the line

How far does the law protect employees from sexual harassment, ask Chris Bryden & Michael Salter

As the maelstrom surrounding Jimmy Savile engulfs the BBC and, if newspapers reports are to be believed, expands to other facets of the public sector, it is useful to consider how much the law has changed over a relatively short period of time and the potential exposure there may be for employers faced with allegations of sexual harassment.

In the employment context, the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) and its predecessor legislation prohibited harassment on grounds of the protected characteristic and, in the case of the Sex Discrimination Act 1976, prohibited sexual harassment which was harassment of a sexual nature and which did not depend on the sex of the victim.

Establishing liability

Recently, in general terms, the law of tort has relaxed considerably the circumstances in which an employer can be liable for the torts of its employees. Gone are the days when an employer would be found not liable for their employee’s acts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll