header-logo header-logo

Drawing the line

09 November 2012 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7537 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

How far does the law protect employees from sexual harassment, ask Chris Bryden & Michael Salter

As the maelstrom surrounding Jimmy Savile engulfs the BBC and, if newspapers reports are to be believed, expands to other facets of the public sector, it is useful to consider how much the law has changed over a relatively short period of time and the potential exposure there may be for employers faced with allegations of sexual harassment.

In the employment context, the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) and its predecessor legislation prohibited harassment on grounds of the protected characteristic and, in the case of the Sex Discrimination Act 1976, prohibited sexual harassment which was harassment of a sexual nature and which did not depend on the sex of the victim.

Establishing liability

Recently, in general terms, the law of tort has relaxed considerably the circumstances in which an employer can be liable for the torts of its employees. Gone are the days when an employer would be found not liable for their employee’s acts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll