header-logo header-logo

06 December 2007 / Joanne Lunn
Issue: 7300 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Drink problem

Joanne Lunn examines the dangers arising from alcohol abuse in the workplace and the legal implications for businesses trying to tackle the problem

Recent research by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development shows that although 40% of employers say alcohol misuse is a major cause of absenteeism and poor productivity in the workplace, few organisations have policies to deal with the problems.

Alcohol misuse among employees costs up to £6.4bn a year. An estimated 17 million working days are lost in the UK per year, amounting to 3%–5% of absences from work. It is also estimated that alcohol is a contributory factor in 20%–25% of workplace accidents.

Employers may face problems if employees consume alcohol during working hours, during breaks or before coming on shift. However, where employees regularly drink heavily or get drunk outside working hours this too may cause difficulties—not only of absenteeism or poor productivity but possible compromised health and safety when an employee has impaired concentration, judgment and co-ordination. Employees may injure themselves or endanger the public or colleagues. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll