header-logo header-logo

Driverless vehicles: a future perfect? (Pt 2)

29 November 2018 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7819 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance , Technology
printer mail-detail

​In the second part of this special series on road traffic accident reform, Nicholas Bevan reports on the difficulties of regulating highly & semi-automated vehicles

Section 2 of the Autonomous and Electric Vehicles Act 2018 (the 2018 Act) confers a new right of action directly against motor insurers This is reserved for victims of accidents caused by ‘ automated vehicles’ when ‘ driving themselves’ . These are vehicles that the minister must first list under s 1 as suitable for lawful use and which are ‘… designed or adapted to be capable, in at least some circumstances or situations, of safely driving themselves … on roads or other public places.. .’ Section 8 interprets ‘ driving themselves’ as ‘… operating in a mode in which it is not being controlled, and does not need to be monitored, by an individual’ .

Most experts doubt that the motor industry is close to producing software that can deliver fully autonomous driving: ie a vehicle that dispenses entirely with the need for a human driver and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll