header-logo header-logo

20 December 2018
Issue: 7822 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Drivers claim victory over Uber

Uber drivers are workers rather than self-employed, the Court of Appeal has confirmed, in the latest triumph for people working in the gig economy.

The decision means drivers James Farrar and Yaseen Aslam, who brought the case, are entitled to holiday pay, paid rest breaks and the minimum wage. The ruling, in Uber BV v Aslam & Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 2748, that the drivers are ‘workers’ under the Employment Rights Act 1996, upholds earlier employment tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions.

The drivers had claimed holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and under-payments of the minimum wage. One claimant claimed he had suffered detriment for being a whistleblower, in breach of Part V of the 1996 Act. 

Uber has been granted permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Issue: 7822 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll