header-logo header-logo

17 January 2008
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-detail

Drivers' sentencing guidelines "problematic"

News

Guidelines for sentencers dealing with driving offences resulting in death, released for consultation by the Sentencing Guidelines Council, have drawn mixed reactions.

The council’s consultation guidelines cover four offences, including, most controversially, the recommendation that those who cause death by careless driving should serve up to three years in prison. In cases involving “momentary inattention” and no aggravating factors, offenders should receive a community sentence.

Mio Sylvester, a partner at motoringlawyers.com, says although making careless driving an imprisonable offence satisfies public demand for serious punishment where death occurs, it’s problematic.
“The new sentencing powers that a driver can be imprisoned for making human mistakes without moral culpability is a departure that is likely to result in some difficult and unfair sentencing cases.”
“Notwithstanding the recommendation of community penalties which, arguably, strike the right sentencing balance, magistrates and judges are likely to be hard pressed by the Crown Prosecution Service, grieving relatives and tabloid journalists and the temptation will be to take a hard line unless and until the Court of Appeal rules otherwise,” Sylvester says.

Road safety charity Brake, however, is horrified that those who cause death by careless driving may only get a community sentence.

A spokeswoman says: “If these recommendations are adopted, there is a danger that the current situation—in which killer drivers too often walk free—will continue. Brake believes a custodial sentence is the correct starting point.”

Draft guidance on: causing death by dangerous driving; causing death by careless driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs; and causing death by driving unlicensed, disqualified or uninsured, was also issued by the council. For most offences, courts will need to assess how bad the driving was and the degree of danger created.

The Motor Insurers’ Bureau welcomes the recognition that people who cause death when driving without insurance justifies more than a fine.
A spokesman says: “These changes only deal with cases where death has ensued. Unfortunately for too long the crime of driving without insurance has not attracted the punishment that reflects the seriousness of the offence.”

Issue: 7304 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll