header-logo header-logo

12 March 2015
Issue: 7644 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

“Drone” law taking flight

Lawyers will need to brush up on drones as the remotely piloted aircraft systems increase in popularity.

As with the internet, the development of drones will require practitioners to “adapt their classical knowledge base to a previously niche activity that will become widespread,” say Joseph Dalby and Ruhi Sethi, of 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square.

“And unless aviation law is your specialisation, it also means absorbing an understanding of air space, the rules of the air, and the specific regulatory regime for unmanned aerial vehicles.”

Writing in NLJ this week, they explain that exposure to “drone law” could arise through regulation, criminal or public law, or the enforcement of private law rights such as nuisance.

Dalby and Sethi predict the Information Commissioner will give directions at some point as “drones put eyes-in-the-sky, a facility which will herald a significant increase in professional surveillance, photojournalism, and curiosity-driven amateurs.”

Issue: 7644 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll