Early determination: an appetite for efficiency

23 January 2026 / Gustavo Moser

Issue: 8146 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration , ADR , International

To gain ground in arbitration, measured early determination is key, writes Gustavo Moser

With early determination, tribunals can dismiss plainly hopeless claims or defences efficiently.
Recent institutional and legislative reforms codify this power, promoting efficiency while safeguarding fairness.
Tribunals must apply it carefully to avoid due-process risks.

Early determination reconciles two arbitral imperatives: efficiency and fairness. It allows tribunals to dispose swiftly of claims or defences that are plainly unsustainable, reducing costs and delay without compromising procedural integrity. Once exceptional, the mechanism is now a regular feature of modern rule sets and legislation.

Institutional & legislative momentum

Arbitral institutions worldwide now expressly empower tribunals to dismiss manifestly unmeritorious or clearly unsustainable claims or defences. The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes introduced this power in 2006 (r 41(5)), later adopted by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (2016 r 29; 2025 r 47), the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Arbitration Institute (2017, art 40; 2023, art 39), and Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (2018

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Early determination: an appetite for efficiency

To gain ground in arbitration, measured early determination is key, writes Gustavo Moser

With early determination, tribunals can dismiss plainly hopeless claims or defences efficiently.
Recent institutional and legislative reforms codify this power, promoting efficiency while safeguarding fairness.
Tribunals must apply it carefully to avoid due-process risks.

Institutional & legislative momentum

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Police, contempt and the rule of law

Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes

NLJ this week: When your brain signs the contract

Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent

NLJ this week: Comparators—how close is close enough?

Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first

NLJ this week: Domicile—more than where you live

In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss

NLJ this week: Arbitration’s fast lane—with guardrails

Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved

Error message

Early determination: an appetite for efficiency

Institutional & legislative momentum

Institutional & legislative momentum

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham