header-logo header-logo

EAT upholds harsh time limit decision

16 August 2007
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

News

An employment tribunal decision not to accept an unfair dismissal claim which was presented 88 seconds late has been upheld by the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

The claimant had tried to submit his claim electronically at about 11.45pm: his claim became out of time at midnight. However, he used the wrong web address, typing “qsi” instead of “gsi”. He then sent a test message about 11.57pm, and sent his actual claim form in 1 minute 28 seconds after midnight.

In Besley v National Grid, Mr Justice Silber said although he could understand the claimant feeling aggrieved since the delay was so small, it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented on time so the tribunal’s decision that the claim was out of time was correct.
Bird & Bird employment lawyer Jeremy Nixon says: “Although the result of this case is extremely hard on the claimant, it perhaps not surprising given the wording of the statute and the public policy considerations which require time limits, particularly those concerned with when claims are commenced, to be rigidly adhered to. Human nature is such that people tend to leave things to the last minute. This case is a stark illustration of the risks this approach entails.”

Issue: 7286 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll