header-logo header-logo

EAT upholds harsh time limit decision

16 August 2007
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

News

An employment tribunal decision not to accept an unfair dismissal claim which was presented 88 seconds late has been upheld by the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

The claimant had tried to submit his claim electronically at about 11.45pm: his claim became out of time at midnight. However, he used the wrong web address, typing “qsi” instead of “gsi”. He then sent a test message about 11.57pm, and sent his actual claim form in 1 minute 28 seconds after midnight.

In Besley v National Grid, Mr Justice Silber said although he could understand the claimant feeling aggrieved since the delay was so small, it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented on time so the tribunal’s decision that the claim was out of time was correct.
Bird & Bird employment lawyer Jeremy Nixon says: “Although the result of this case is extremely hard on the claimant, it perhaps not surprising given the wording of the statute and the public policy considerations which require time limits, particularly those concerned with when claims are commenced, to be rigidly adhered to. Human nature is such that people tend to leave things to the last minute. This case is a stark illustration of the risks this approach entails.”

Issue: 7286 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll