header-logo header-logo

Economic crime action plan moves into second wave

04 April 2023
Issue: 8020 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Criminal , Financial services litigation
printer mail-detail
The government has launched Economic Crime Plan 2—a three-year public-private partnership plan to cut fraud, money laundering and sanctions evasion, tackle kleptocracy and recover more criminal assets.

The 43-point action plan, announced by the Home Office and HM Treasury last week, includes reviewing the Law Commission’s recommendations on corporate criminal liability and introducing any accepted changes, including legislation on the identification doctrine and a failure to prevent fraud offence.

On disclosure, the government will look again at making the process more manageable in the digital age, exploring options for legislative reform. It will also explore ways for suspected illicit funds held in suspense accounts to be used in tackling economic crime, and to enable more recovered criminal assets including through the Asset Recovery Incentivisation Scheme, to be reinvested in tackling crime.  

An additional 475 financial crime investigators will be recruited across intelligence, enforcement and asset recovery agencies, with the aim of tackling money laundering and recovering an extra £1bn in criminal assets in the next 10 years. The National Crime Agency’s combatting kleptocracy cell will be expanded; £100m will be invested in technology, including data analytics; and a multi-agency crypto cell will be created to tackle illicit crypto assets.

Alun Milford, criminal litigation partner at Kingsley Napley, said: ‘The emphasis seems to be on gathering intelligence and training investigators. But it is not clear how those new investigators will use the improved intelligence picture they will be given.

‘Is it intended that they be used to disrupt fraudsters by, for example, bringing civil recovery investigations with the aim of forfeiting assets or are they to be encouraged to bring criminal justice investigations with a view to bringing prosecutions? If the former, that is a mistake: a regime of disruption and civil recovery will not secure public confidence. If the latter, then money should also be set aside for prosecutors and the courts.’

Welcoming the plan, Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: “We note the importance of the government’s focus on tackling illicit finance in the UK.

‘The profession invests significant resources in tackling money laundering and financial crime. We look forward to continuing our work with the government to deliver the plan through a new approach to public-private prioritisation. This includes joint priorities to maximise public and private resources to prevent, detect and disrupt economic crime, as well as the ambitious reform of the UK’s supervisory regime.

‘Encouraging greater information and intelligence sharing will also help to better identify and target criminality to ensure that the UK is a hostile place for illicit finance.’

More than £12bn of criminal cash is generated annually in the UK each year, while hundreds of billions of pounds of laundered money are believed to pass through UK corporate structures of financial institutions each year, according to National Crime agency (NCA) estimates.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll