header-logo header-logo

Economic crime action plan moves into second wave

04 April 2023
Issue: 8020 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Criminal , Financial services litigation
printer mail-detail
The government has launched Economic Crime Plan 2—a three-year public-private partnership plan to cut fraud, money laundering and sanctions evasion, tackle kleptocracy and recover more criminal assets.

The 43-point action plan, announced by the Home Office and HM Treasury last week, includes reviewing the Law Commission’s recommendations on corporate criminal liability and introducing any accepted changes, including legislation on the identification doctrine and a failure to prevent fraud offence.

On disclosure, the government will look again at making the process more manageable in the digital age, exploring options for legislative reform. It will also explore ways for suspected illicit funds held in suspense accounts to be used in tackling economic crime, and to enable more recovered criminal assets including through the Asset Recovery Incentivisation Scheme, to be reinvested in tackling crime.  

An additional 475 financial crime investigators will be recruited across intelligence, enforcement and asset recovery agencies, with the aim of tackling money laundering and recovering an extra £1bn in criminal assets in the next 10 years. The National Crime Agency’s combatting kleptocracy cell will be expanded; £100m will be invested in technology, including data analytics; and a multi-agency crypto cell will be created to tackle illicit crypto assets.

Alun Milford, criminal litigation partner at Kingsley Napley, said: ‘The emphasis seems to be on gathering intelligence and training investigators. But it is not clear how those new investigators will use the improved intelligence picture they will be given.

‘Is it intended that they be used to disrupt fraudsters by, for example, bringing civil recovery investigations with the aim of forfeiting assets or are they to be encouraged to bring criminal justice investigations with a view to bringing prosecutions? If the former, that is a mistake: a regime of disruption and civil recovery will not secure public confidence. If the latter, then money should also be set aside for prosecutors and the courts.’

Welcoming the plan, Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: “We note the importance of the government’s focus on tackling illicit finance in the UK.

‘The profession invests significant resources in tackling money laundering and financial crime. We look forward to continuing our work with the government to deliver the plan through a new approach to public-private prioritisation. This includes joint priorities to maximise public and private resources to prevent, detect and disrupt economic crime, as well as the ambitious reform of the UK’s supervisory regime.

‘Encouraging greater information and intelligence sharing will also help to better identify and target criminality to ensure that the UK is a hostile place for illicit finance.’

More than £12bn of criminal cash is generated annually in the UK each year, while hundreds of billions of pounds of laundered money are believed to pass through UK corporate structures of financial institutions each year, according to National Crime agency (NCA) estimates.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll