header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

Economic downturn impacting on magic circle firms

Profession reduces headcount and knuckles down to ride out recession

The credit crunch is biting into the Magic Circle, with Linklaters’ announcement this week that it is to cut jobs for up to 120 junior lawyers in its London office.

Trainee solicitors will not be affected, the firm said, although there could be up to 150 redundancies among support staff.

Linklaters managing partner Simon Davies said: “There have been significant changes in the financial markets and the wider economy. This has affected the clients we serve.

“We are acting now to reduce our headcount in order to meet anticipated demand. It is vital that the firm is in the best shape to meet the challenges which lie ahead. This action is taken reluctantly and after a great deal of careful thought.”

Linklaters, the second largest law firm in the world, employs more than 500 partners and 3,000 fee-earners.

Last month, Clifford Chance announced it had begun a redundancy consultation that would lead to 70–80 fee earners in its London office losing their jobs.

Allen & Overy is holding redundancy consultations in its Hong Kong office, with 10 lawyers’ jobs potentially affected. A spokesperson said the firm was restructuring the office after seven partners left at the end of last year.

On whether the firm might see further redundancy consultations, the spokesperson said: “Our approach is we can’t rule anything out, no-one here has a crystal ball.”

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer said it currently had no redundancy consultations planned.

The firm is running a two-week, 90-session internal communications programme for everyone in its London office, to encourage people to improve their knowledge of business areas outside their own.

A spokesperson said: “With the business landscape changing so rapidly, it is even more crucial for us to stay close to our clients, and to be able to develop our offering to meet their changing needs.”

Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll