header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007 / Anthony Lavers , David Thomas , Miles Keeping
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Environment , Property
printer mail-detail

Efficiency drive

David Thomas QC, Miles Keeping and Anthony Lavers review the Energy Performance of Buildings Regulations

The Energy Performance of Buildings (Certificates and Inspections) Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/991) (the EPB regulations) and the Home Information Pack Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/992) (the HIP regulations) are the two statutory instruments that the government has introduced to implement the EU’s Energy Performance of Buildings Directive 2002/91/EC (the Directive). They are significant because when, and if, they take full effect they will create a number of new duties for commercial and residential property owners affecting property sales and rentals.

CREATING A LOW CARBON ECONOMY

The purpose of the EPB regulations is to “encourage owners and tenants to choose energy efficient buildings when seeking new accommodation and to improve the performance of buildings they occupy” (Department for Communities and Local Government circular 02/2007). The EPB regulations represent one of many instruments in the government’s ambitious agenda to create a low carbon economy. The reduction of carbon emissions is a topical issue, subject to wide media

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll