header-logo header-logo

Electronic billing: the pros & cons

11 August 2017 / Francis Kendall
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Computers cannot & should not replace the experience of practitioners & the judiciary, says Francis Kendall

Following various pilots since 2015, there has been minimal, arguably no, uptake of the concept of electronic bills of costs at the Senior Courts Costs Office (SCCO). However, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee has now proposed that electronic bills will become compulsory in the SCCO and the county courts from 6 April 2018.

“ My overriding concern is that the moves inspired by Jackson LJ to deal with costs in litigation seem to impact those practising in costs more than the litigation itself”

The proposal remains subject to ministerial and parliamentary approval but that seems likely to be given, although the implementation date could change depending on when these are received. The changes to the CPR will most likely be included in the next scheduled update, allowing for voluntary use from October.

One has to recognise the hard work undertaken by the Hutton committee

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll