header-logo header-logo

11 August 2017 / Francis Kendall
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Electronic billing: the pros & cons

Computers cannot & should not replace the experience of practitioners & the judiciary, says Francis Kendall

Following various pilots since 2015, there has been minimal, arguably no, uptake of the concept of electronic bills of costs at the Senior Courts Costs Office (SCCO). However, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee has now proposed that electronic bills will become compulsory in the SCCO and the county courts from 6 April 2018.

“ My overriding concern is that the moves inspired by Jackson LJ to deal with costs in litigation seem to impact those practising in costs more than the litigation itself”

The proposal remains subject to ministerial and parliamentary approval but that seems likely to be given, although the implementation date could change depending on when these are received. The changes to the CPR will most likely be included in the next scheduled update, allowing for voluntary use from October.

One has to recognise the hard work undertaken by the Hutton committee

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll