header-logo header-logo

Electronic billing: the pros & cons

11 August 2017 / Francis Kendall
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Computers cannot & should not replace the experience of practitioners & the judiciary, says Francis Kendall

Following various pilots since 2015, there has been minimal, arguably no, uptake of the concept of electronic bills of costs at the Senior Courts Costs Office (SCCO). However, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee has now proposed that electronic bills will become compulsory in the SCCO and the county courts from 6 April 2018.

“ My overriding concern is that the moves inspired by Jackson LJ to deal with costs in litigation seem to impact those practising in costs more than the litigation itself”

The proposal remains subject to ministerial and parliamentary approval but that seems likely to be given, although the implementation date could change depending on when these are received. The changes to the CPR will most likely be included in the next scheduled update, allowing for voluntary use from October.

One has to recognise the hard work undertaken by the Hutton committee

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll