header-logo header-logo

The empire strikes back

11 April 2014 / Adam Craggs
Issue: 7602 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
web_craggs

 It’s Groundhog Day for HMRC as the ECJ again makes its presence felt, says Adam Craggs

There are two common law restitutionary remedies applicable in relation to tax payments:

  • First, Woolwich claims for restitution of tax unlawfully demanded or levied (see Woolwich Equitable Building Society v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1993] AC 70, [1991] 4 All ER 577). Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980) provides that the time limit for making such a claim is six years from the date of the payment in question.
  • Second, Deutsche Morgan Grenfell (DMG) claims for restitution of tax paid under mistake of law (see Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group plc v IRC [2007] AC 558, [2006] All ER (D) 298 (Oct)). The House of Lords held in Kleinwort Benson Limited v Lincoln City Council [1999] 2 AC 349, [1998] 4 All ER 513 that claims could be made for restitution of payments made under mistake of law. It was not clear whether that decision applied in the tax context. The House of Lords subsequently
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll