header-logo header-logo

04 January 2007
Issue: 7254 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employers predict problems with flexible working

New regulations giving extended legal rights to working parents will be problematic when introduced in April, employers questioned in a recent survey say.

The Work and Families Act 2006 extends maternity and adoption pay from six to nine months and extends the right to request flexible working to carers of adults. It also allows the government to extend paternity leave rights and maternity pay to 12 months.

Only around one in 10 of the employers questioned by CIPD/KPMG believe the Act’s provisions will benefit their organisations, with smaller employers more likely than larger employers to cite difficulties. Almost two-thirds (64%) think the paternity leave provisions will cause some (48%) or significant (16%) difficulties while 57% think the maternity and adoption pay provisions will cause problems.

Only 4% of employers think the new right for carers to request flexible working will cause significant difficulties, although 36% expect this to cause some difficulty. However, 35% strongly favour extending the right to all employees. 51% consider themselves prepared to implement the Act’s provisions. Just 7% consider themselves poorly prepared.

Bird & Bird consultant Jeremy Nixon says: “Although smaller employers are more likely to see potential problems, even within larger organisations people tend to work in small teams and if members of these teams are given extra rights to take time off work this can create difficulties.

“We also see issues with the administration of the scheme whereby mothers and fathers can transfer leave between them.
Employers are likely to regard this as further red tape which they will need to manage in the increasingly competitive and globalised economy.” 

Issue: 7254 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll