header-logo header-logo

EMPLOYMENT

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council v Pratt [2007] All ER (D) 19 (Jan)

Employees can choose to use the modified statutory grievance procedure if they are no longer in employment.

HELD For the purposes of step one of the modified grievance procedure, an employee must set out in his statement the essential reasons why he holds his grievance, in sufficient detail to enable the employer to respond. Where the employee knows as much as or more than the employer, eg where the grievance relates to harassment or bullying, the employee will be expected to set out his account in reasonable detail, informing the employer of the important matters which the employer should investigate and consider.

Where the employee may not have full access to the facts, but suspects that certain facts exist, it will be sufficient that the written statement identifies in reasonable detail why he holds those suspicions. In considering whether the statutory requirements have been met, a tribunal will not necessarily expect the original basis of grievance to be as detailed as the subsequent claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll