header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

EMPLOYMENT

City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council v Pratt [2007] All ER (D) 19 (Jan)

Employees can choose to use the modified statutory grievance procedure if they are no longer in employment.

HELD For the purposes of step one of the modified grievance procedure, an employee must set out in his statement the essential reasons why he holds his grievance, in sufficient detail to enable the employer to respond. Where the employee knows as much as or more than the employer, eg where the grievance relates to harassment or bullying, the employee will be expected to set out his account in reasonable detail, informing the employer of the important matters which the employer should investigate and consider.

Where the employee may not have full access to the facts, but suspects that certain facts exist, it will be sufficient that the written statement identifies in reasonable detail why he holds those suspicions. In considering whether the statutory requirements have been met, a tribunal will not necessarily expect the original basis of grievance to be as detailed as the subsequent claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
New planning fee rises, wider trade union access rights and a service-by-email trap feature in Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
back-to-top-scroll