header-logo header-logo

EMPLOYMENT

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council v Pratt [2007] All ER (D) 19 (Jan)

Employees can choose to use the modified statutory grievance procedure if they are no longer in employment.

HELD For the purposes of step one of the modified grievance procedure, an employee must set out in his statement the essential reasons why he holds his grievance, in sufficient detail to enable the employer to respond. Where the employee knows as much as or more than the employer, eg where the grievance relates to harassment or bullying, the employee will be expected to set out his account in reasonable detail, informing the employer of the important matters which the employer should investigate and consider.

Where the employee may not have full access to the facts, but suspects that certain facts exist, it will be sufficient that the written statement identifies in reasonable detail why he holds those suspicions. In considering whether the statutory requirements have been met, a tribunal will not necessarily expect the original basis of grievance to be as detailed as the subsequent claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll