header-logo header-logo

Employment

02 September 2011
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Hellewell and another v Axa Services Ltd and another UKEAT/0084/11/CEA, [2011] All ER (D) 89 (Aug)

The words “properly payable” in s 13(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 referred to a legal, but not necessarily a contractual, entitlement on the part of the employee to the payment. Consideration of whether there was a sum legally payable in accordance with s 13(3) of the Act was an exercise which had to be completed before s 13(1) and (2) of the Act could apply and it was only if the answer was in the affirmative that there had to be a consideration as to whether there was a deduction from that sum so as to invoke s 13(1) and (2). That conclusion was supported by the use of the word “deduction” in s 13(1) and (3) of the Act as that indicated a reduction of sums otherwise payable pursuant to the legal entitlement of the employee in question.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll