header-logo header-logo

02 September 2011
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

Hellewell and another v Axa Services Ltd and another UKEAT/0084/11/CEA, [2011] All ER (D) 89 (Aug)

The words “properly payable” in s 13(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 referred to a legal, but not necessarily a contractual, entitlement on the part of the employee to the payment. Consideration of whether there was a sum legally payable in accordance with s 13(3) of the Act was an exercise which had to be completed before s 13(1) and (2) of the Act could apply and it was only if the answer was in the affirmative that there had to be a consideration as to whether there was a deduction from that sum so as to invoke s 13(1) and (2). That conclusion was supported by the use of the word “deduction” in s 13(1) and (3) of the Act as that indicated a reduction of sums otherwise payable pursuant to the legal entitlement of the employee in question.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll