header-logo header-logo

19 October 2012
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

Netjets Management Ltd v Central Arbitration Committee [2012] EWHC 2685 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 57 (Oct)

It was clear from Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Ltd [2012] 2 All ER 905 that, in cases concerned with individual employment rights, “the starting point”, when considering the territorial jurisdiction of employment tribunals, was that the employment had to have a “stronger connection with Great Britain that with the foreign country where the employee works”. The test to be applied was the “sufficiently strong” test: “the question of law is whether s 94(1) applies to this particular employment. The question of fact is whether the connection between the circumstances of the employment and Great Britain and with British employment law was sufficiently strong to enable it to be said that it would be appropriate for the employee to have a claim for unfair dismissal in Great Britain”.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll