header-logo header-logo

Employment—Demotion—Facebook posts

23 November 2012
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2012] EWHC 3221 (Ch)

High Court, Chancery Division, Briggs J, 16 November 2012

A claimant has successfully brought an action for breach of contract against his employer for breach of contract, arising out of his demotion following Facebook comments on his wall. A reasonable reader of the claimant’s Facebook wall page could not rationally conclude that the comments had been made in any relevant sense on the defendant’s behalf or that they would damage the defendant’s reputation.

Hugh Tomlinson QC (instructed by Aughton Ainsworth) for the claimant. Andrew Short QC (instructed by Devonshires Solicitors) for the Trust.

The claimant was employed as a housing manager by the defendant, which was a private housing trust. In February 2011, he placed a link on his Facebook page to a BBC news article about gay marriages in church, and added the comment “an equality too far”. On the same day one of his Facebook friends responded with the comment “Does this mean you don’t approve” to which he later responded:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll