header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 20 July 2007

APPARENT BIAS >>
VOCATIONAL TRAINING AND RACE DISCRIMINATINON >>
DISFIGUREMENT AND DISABILITY >>

One of the recommendations of the Gibbons Report, which favoured repeal of the statutory procedures, was to “simplify employment law”. In fact, work on this has already been started in what used to be the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), along with a review of discrimination law with a view to having one, consolidated piece of legislation. While we can all say “amen” to this particular prayer, it remains to be seen how thoroughly this can be carried out in practice. One suggestion might be simply to pass legislation repealing every fourth word in the current statute law, on the basis that it would then be 25% shorter but 100% as unintelligible.

Of course, the first simplification is to get rid of the statutory procedures and apparently (to its credit) the DTI’s successor is standing firm against any backsliding views in the consultation that perhaps they were not so bad after all, and sticking with the Gibbons line. As an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll