header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 20 July 2007

APPARENT BIAS >>
VOCATIONAL TRAINING AND RACE DISCRIMINATINON >>
DISFIGUREMENT AND DISABILITY >>

One of the recommendations of the Gibbons Report, which favoured repeal of the statutory procedures, was to “simplify employment law”. In fact, work on this has already been started in what used to be the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), along with a review of discrimination law with a view to having one, consolidated piece of legislation. While we can all say “amen” to this particular prayer, it remains to be seen how thoroughly this can be carried out in practice. One suggestion might be simply to pass legislation repealing every fourth word in the current statute law, on the basis that it would then be 25% shorter but 100% as unintelligible.

Of course, the first simplification is to get rid of the statutory procedures and apparently (to its credit) the DTI’s successor is standing firm against any backsliding views in the consultation that perhaps they were not so bad after all, and sticking with the Gibbons line. As an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll