header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 13 October 2013

13 October 2023 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8044 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
142623
In the EAT, as in life, the pendulum may ‘swing’ one way or the other, and then later swing back. Ian Smith explains all in this month’s update
  • Termination by agreement as an alternative to dismissal (Riley v Direct Line Insurance Group plc).
  • Time limit in a case of failure to do something (Fernandez v Department of Work and Pensions).
  • The form of employment tribunal judgments and the attitude of the Employment Appeal Tribunal to them (Edwards v Pick Everard).

The question as to the extent to which appellate courts and tribunals should give guidance to employment tribunals (ETs) on particular areas of employment law has historically shifted around. After unfair dismissal came in in 1972, there followed a period of judicial activism in this area, given that it was entirely new law and the aim was to ensure a reasonable level of consistency between ETs in different parts of the country in relation to frequently-recurring employment problems. This can still be seen in formative

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll