header-logo header-logo

05 February 2020 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7873 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 5 February 2020

15314
Sent packing? Ian Smith says there’s life after Brexit for unfair dismissal claims
  • Unfair dismissal & human rights.
  • Reasonable investigation in general and investigatory hearings.
  • Applying the correct test for contributory fault.

At the end of a month that culminated with our departure from the EU at the macro end of the scale, it is perhaps comforting that, not only does life go on but, at the micro end, the case law during it has concentrated on some of the eternal verities of the almost immutable law of unfair dismissal, which has been with us since the Industrial Relations Act 1971 and has suffered since then from remarkably little change in the basic legislation.

Unfair dismissal & human rights

The key point in Q v Secretary of State for Justice UKEAT/0120/19before Judge Auerbach is the affirmation of the approach taken by the Court of Appeal in Turner v East Midlands Trains Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1470 , [2013] IRLR 107, [2013] 3 All

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott bolsters housebuilder expertise in Birmingham

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll