header-logo header-logo

09 May 2019 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 9 May 2019

Ian Smith cleans up the latest tribunal cases & considers the importance of acting in time & the difficulty of washing off reputational harm

  • Potential equal pay arrears can be claimed as a guaranteed debt.
  • Extension of time and the old fees regime.
  • Striking out in the case of a litigant in person.
  • Restricted reporting orders and individual respondents.
  •  

    Of the four cases considered this month, only one concerned a point of substantive law, namely whether potential arrears under an ongoing equal pay claim can be claimed on the employer’s insolvency from the secretary of state as a guaranteed debt; the Court of Appeal has upheld in full the earlier important Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision on this unusual, abstruse but possibly important point. The other three cases concerned procedural matters of a wide scope, covering extensions of time based on the effects of the old fees regime, the exercise of an employment tribunal’s (ET’s) strike-out power in the case of a litigant in person, and the perennially

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

    Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

    Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

    Mishcon de Reya—trainees

    Mishcon de Reya—trainees

    Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

    Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

    Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

    Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

    NEWS
    LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
    The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
    Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
    An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
    Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
    back-to-top-scroll