header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 17 July 2008

17 July 2008 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7330 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION

EQUAL PAY CONFLICT

EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT

The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995) has had a major impact on employment law, with the received wisdom being that it was intended to go beyond ordinary notions of equality (the basis of the rest of discrimination law) and give greater rights to disabled employees, as a matter of social policy. Indeed, one argument has always been that it really should have been entitled the Disability Protection Act, in order precisely to differentiate it from other discrimination headings. However, this interpretation has been given a rude shock this month by the House of Lords in a landmark decision going to the root of the legislation. That case has dominated the employment law news, but the month has also seen significant developments in relation to permissible comparators in equal pay cases, the possible conflict between industrial relations and EC law and the drafting of compromise agreements in cases where the employee leaves under a cloud.

THE MEANING OF DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
The decision of the House of Lords

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
back-to-top-scroll