header-logo header-logo

17 July 2008 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7330 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 17 July 2008

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION

EQUAL PAY CONFLICT

EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT

The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995) has had a major impact on employment law, with the received wisdom being that it was intended to go beyond ordinary notions of equality (the basis of the rest of discrimination law) and give greater rights to disabled employees, as a matter of social policy. Indeed, one argument has always been that it really should have been entitled the Disability Protection Act, in order precisely to differentiate it from other discrimination headings. However, this interpretation has been given a rude shock this month by the House of Lords in a landmark decision going to the root of the legislation. That case has dominated the employment law news, but the month has also seen significant developments in relation to permissible comparators in equal pay cases, the possible conflict between industrial relations and EC law and the drafting of compromise agreements in cases where the employee leaves under a cloud.

THE MEANING OF DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
The decision of the House of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll