header-logo header-logo

17 July 2008 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7330 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 17 July 2008

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION

EQUAL PAY CONFLICT

EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT

The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995) has had a major impact on employment law, with the received wisdom being that it was intended to go beyond ordinary notions of equality (the basis of the rest of discrimination law) and give greater rights to disabled employees, as a matter of social policy. Indeed, one argument has always been that it really should have been entitled the Disability Protection Act, in order precisely to differentiate it from other discrimination headings. However, this interpretation has been given a rude shock this month by the House of Lords in a landmark decision going to the root of the legislation. That case has dominated the employment law news, but the month has also seen significant developments in relation to permissible comparators in equal pay cases, the possible conflict between industrial relations and EC law and the drafting of compromise agreements in cases where the employee leaves under a cloud.

THE MEANING OF DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
The decision of the House of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll