header-logo header-logo

24 July 2014 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7616 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 24 July 2014

employment_smith_0_0

Ian Smith considers the latest employment law developments

In a month which saw newsworthy employment law innovations on the legislative front relating to the extension of flexible working requests to any employee with six months’ service (not just those caring for the young) and planned moves to ban exclusivity clauses in nil-hours contracts, the case law selected here reflects a rather standard issue in employment law, namely the interaction between the major statutory rights and their common law bases. They cover the law on penalty clauses in employment contracts, affirmation of contract by the employee in the face of employer repudiation, how final warnings operate when there has been a lapse in the timing and finally how the common law defence of illegality applies where the allegation is one of harassment.

Penalty clause or liquidated damage clause?

In Li v First Marine Solutions Ltd UKEAT/0045/13, a question arose as to whether a clause in the departing employee’s contract constituted an enforceable liquidated damages clause or an unenforceable penalty clause. The matter

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll