header-logo header-logo

24 July 2014 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7616 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 24 July 2014

employment_smith_0_0

Ian Smith considers the latest employment law developments

In a month which saw newsworthy employment law innovations on the legislative front relating to the extension of flexible working requests to any employee with six months’ service (not just those caring for the young) and planned moves to ban exclusivity clauses in nil-hours contracts, the case law selected here reflects a rather standard issue in employment law, namely the interaction between the major statutory rights and their common law bases. They cover the law on penalty clauses in employment contracts, affirmation of contract by the employee in the face of employer repudiation, how final warnings operate when there has been a lapse in the timing and finally how the common law defence of illegality applies where the allegation is one of harassment.

Penalty clause or liquidated damage clause?

In Li v First Marine Solutions Ltd UKEAT/0045/13, a question arose as to whether a clause in the departing employee’s contract constituted an enforceable liquidated damages clause or an unenforceable penalty clause. The matter

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll