header-logo header-logo

12 June 2026 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8165 / Categories: Features , Employment , Equality , Discrimination , Tribunals
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 12 June 2026

252172
© Getty images

Some employment law controversies are never truly put to bed: they are only sleeping. Ian Smith rings the alarm on the latest cases

  • The Court of Appeal’s latest equal pay ruling in Tesco Supermarkets v Element reignites debate over how large-scale equal pay claims should be enforced and managed.
  • New appellate decisions also clarify the scope of protection for fixed-term employees and the approach to burden of proof in discrimination cases.

One aspect of your humble author having been involved in employment law since the late 18th century is an ability to remember past controversies that have gone to sleep. However, like King Arthur under the Isle of Avalon, these are only sleeping and can suddenly come back into focus.

One recent example is arguably the Litigation of the Year (or Decade?) in Tesco Supermarkets v Element, the latest instalments of which have now reached the Court of Appeal ([2026] EWCA Civ 580). The old controversy here goes to the very heart of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll