header-logo header-logo

02 September 2020 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7900 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 4 September 2020

26567
Ian Smith leaves his beach hut to take shelter from the wind & consider three cases covering common ground…but each with a peculiar twist
  • Calculation of damages for wrongful dismissal.
  • When is it reasonable to dispense with procedures?
  • Re-engagement and lack of trust and confidence.

The three cases considered this month have one thing in common, namely that they all concern well travelled areas of basic employment law, but have a peculiar twist to them. The first concerns the venerable law on damages for wrongful dismissal, but with the twist of arising under a fixed-term sports contract with a most peculiar provision on notice. The second concerns the position in unfair dismissal law of a dismissal without going through applicable disciplinary procedures, usually a complete no-no, but here held to be fair. The third (also as it happens in a sports context) concerns the law on re-engagement and how far an employer can oppose it on the grounds of lack of trust and confidence (arguably a feature of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll