header-logo header-logo

21 May 2015 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7653 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 21 May 2015

nlj_7653_smith_feature

Ian Smith considers the common law on undiscovered misconduct & follows the developing law on early conciliation

As I recovered from the shock of the general election, with my own private (and highly reliable) poll having shown a clear win for the Monster Raving Loony Party (whose employment law policies seemed much more sensible than anything coming out of Westminster or Brussels), I was then faced with an offer I could not refuse from my old mucker Dr John McMullen (the Don Corleone of Newcastle) that if I dared to nick the Woolworths case on redundancy consultation for this column I would wake up with a severed horse’s head in my bed. Being of a religion that abhors violence (I am a born again coward) I of course caved in to this delicate request. The cases selected this month therefore are rather different. The first concerns the exhumation of a very old common law rule that is capable of strengthening the employer’s hand considerably on termination. The rest of this column

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll