header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment Law Brief: 24 April 2008

SEX DISCRIMINATION >>
REDUNDANCY CONSULTATION >>
MATERNITY LEAVE >>

The statutory procedures continue to vex us, and it must be hoped that when their eventual demise comes they will (unlike the forms of action) not continue to rule us from their graves. We must still watch out for further responses from the government to the Gibbons Report, and ACAS is due to consult before too long on a revised version of its Code of Practice No 1, which is to be an essential element in whatever replaces the procedures. In the meantime the case law continues to troop along gaily, with decisions in the last month giving further guidance on what level of information needs to be in a grievance document to satisfy that procedure (see Ward v University of Essex [2008] UKEAT/391/07, [2008] All ER (D) 123 (Mar)) and once again resolutely declining to give any overreaching guidance on how tribunals should operate the “uplift” on compensation in a case of failure by the employer to comply with the dismissal procedure (see Butler

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll