header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment Law Brief: 24 April 2008

SEX DISCRIMINATION >>
REDUNDANCY CONSULTATION >>
MATERNITY LEAVE >>

The statutory procedures continue to vex us, and it must be hoped that when their eventual demise comes they will (unlike the forms of action) not continue to rule us from their graves. We must still watch out for further responses from the government to the Gibbons Report, and ACAS is due to consult before too long on a revised version of its Code of Practice No 1, which is to be an essential element in whatever replaces the procedures. In the meantime the case law continues to troop along gaily, with decisions in the last month giving further guidance on what level of information needs to be in a grievance document to satisfy that procedure (see Ward v University of Essex [2008] UKEAT/391/07, [2008] All ER (D) 123 (Mar)) and once again resolutely declining to give any overreaching guidance on how tribunals should operate the “uplift” on compensation in a case of failure by the employer to comply with the dismissal procedure (see Butler

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll