header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 14 January 2016

14 January 2016 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7682 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Ian Smith kicks off the new year with some complicated case law

Now that the season of goodwill is mercifully over and we can revert to type, ie viewing each other with mutual suspicion if not positive dislike, the attention of employment lawyers (and anyone else strange enough to read this column for enjoyment) is drawn to three cases reported shortly before Christmas. They all concern important facets of current law and equally all of them show how complicated the answers to them can be. The first concerns part-time worker protection, which was eventually held not to apply to the claimant, even though at first sight he seemed to have a pretty good case. The second concerns time limits in discrimination law and in other forms of employment cases, being concerned to maintain an important distinction between them. Conversely, the third case (a relatively rare one these days on protection from detriment and/or dismissal for trade union reasons) is concerned to maintain consistency between the two statutory causes of action in question.

Advocate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll