header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 19 February 2016

19 February 2016 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7687 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7687_smith

Ian Smith notes the recent newsworthy decisions from the employment courts

The most newsworthy case in the last month has to be Barbulescu v Romania (App 61496/08) where the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) held that an employer’s investigation into an employee’s private use of its e-mail system did not breach Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. It was widely reported in the press in fairly black and white terms as to the employer’s rights here but your humble author agrees very much with the points made by Chris Bryden and Michael Salter in their recent article that the decision is much more nuanced than that, being largely a question of fact and reasonable conduct in each case (see “Becoming anti-social (Pt 2)”, NLJ, 29 January 2016, p 10). In particular, it is worth pointing out the following factors present on the facts of that case:

(i) there was a clear contractual term outlawing any personal usage;

(ii) that policy was enforced—to the claimant’s knowledge, another employee

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll