header-logo header-logo

19 February 2016 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7687 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 19 February 2016

nlj_7687_smith

Ian Smith notes the recent newsworthy decisions from the employment courts

The most newsworthy case in the last month has to be Barbulescu v Romania (App 61496/08) where the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) held that an employer’s investigation into an employee’s private use of its e-mail system did not breach Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. It was widely reported in the press in fairly black and white terms as to the employer’s rights here but your humble author agrees very much with the points made by Chris Bryden and Michael Salter in their recent article that the decision is much more nuanced than that, being largely a question of fact and reasonable conduct in each case (see “Becoming anti-social (Pt 2)”, NLJ, 29 January 2016, p 10). In particular, it is worth pointing out the following factors present on the facts of that case:

(i) there was a clear contractual term outlawing any personal usage;

(ii) that policy was enforced—to the claimant’s knowledge, another employee

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll