header-logo header-logo

19 February 2016 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7687 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 19 February 2016

nlj_7687_smith

Ian Smith notes the recent newsworthy decisions from the employment courts

The most newsworthy case in the last month has to be Barbulescu v Romania (App 61496/08) where the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) held that an employer’s investigation into an employee’s private use of its e-mail system did not breach Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. It was widely reported in the press in fairly black and white terms as to the employer’s rights here but your humble author agrees very much with the points made by Chris Bryden and Michael Salter in their recent article that the decision is much more nuanced than that, being largely a question of fact and reasonable conduct in each case (see “Becoming anti-social (Pt 2)”, NLJ, 29 January 2016, p 10). In particular, it is worth pointing out the following factors present on the facts of that case:

(i) there was a clear contractual term outlawing any personal usage;

(ii) that policy was enforced—to the claimant’s knowledge, another employee

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll