header-logo header-logo

28 July 2016 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7709 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 28 July 2016

nlj_7709_channon_smith

The employment law gods give with one hand and take back with the other, says Ian Smith

  • Conflict of authority on a point that has arisen only recently as to the present ACAS Code’s applicability.
  • Applications for injunctions to restrain threatened industrial action, with very different outcomes.

Employment law is hardly known normally as a haven of peace and quiet, but given what else has been going on this last month we might perhaps count ourselves lucky to be able to seek refuge in it. If there is a theme to the four cases chosen for this Brief, it may be that the employment law gods give with one hand and take back with the other. The first and second cases (ironically on the very first ACAS Code which has been with us forever) disclose a conflict of authority on a point that has arisen only recently as to the present Code’s applicability. The third and fourth cases are relatively rare examples these days of applications for injunctions to restrain threatened

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll