header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 16 July 2021

16 July 2021 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7941 / Categories: Features , Employment , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
52823
Bargaining rights denied: Ian Smith reports on Deliveroo drivers, detriments & debatable opinions
  • Reconsideration of the defence of illegality in employment cases.
  • The application of the European Convention on Human Rights: arts 11 and 17.

The last month has been a busy one in both the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) and the Court of Appeal on employment issues. The first case considered concerns a purely common law point on how the general doctrine of illegality is to be applied to employment cases. However, the other three cases concern the application of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), but with interestingly mixed results. In the second case, the Court of Appeal declined to apply Art 11 to help the Deliveroo riders and their union in claiming bargaining rights. On the contrary, in the third case the EAT relied at least in part on the little-used art 17, and in the fourth case the EAT held that Art 11 did apply in order to extend protection from union-related detriment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll