header-logo header-logo

08 March 2018 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7784 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 8 March 2018

nlj_7784_smith

At last! Ian Smith brings clarity & some common sense to working hours, terms & divisions

  • Statutory rights for agency workers.
  • Employer knowledge and opinion.
  • Division, practice & procedure.

Clarification is the name of the game in the three cases covered in this update:

(i) that an agency worker’s statutory rights to (certain) equal terms cannot be bought out by paying a higher hourly rate (but also that the phrase ‘duration of working time’ does not mean that the agency worker must be hired to work the same number of hours as a permanent worker);

(ii) that an employer in a disability case may reasonably rely on advice from an occupational health or other similar department, as long as it does not just rubber stamp it; and

(iii) that a contract action brought before a tribunal under the Extension of Jurisdiction Order must be against the employer itself, not some other party. In a sense, all of these seem fairly obvious but, although the decisions all come down on that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll