header-logo header-logo

14 October 2022 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7998 / Categories: Features , Employment , Privilege
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 14 October 2022

97423
Can documents retrospectively acquire legal professional privilege? Not without a time machine, says Ian Smith in this month’s brief
  • Early conciliation certificates in multiple cases.
  • Legal professional privilege—no retrospective effect.
  • Reconsideration of judgments and default by a representative.
  • Possible bias by an Employment Appeal Tribunal side member.

Employment case law in the last month has concentrated largely on matters of procedure, rather than substance. The first two cases show that, in fields as intensively ploughed as these, very particular points can still arise for determination at appellate level. They concern applying the early conciliation rules to multiple cases, and whether legal professional privilege can ever apply retrospectively to documents which as initially produced were not privileged. The third and fourth cases concern fairly well-established rules (on reconsideration of judgments and possible bias by a side member) but provide particularly interesting examples, with the odd twist.

Early conciliation certificates

The judgment in Clark and Others v Sainsburys Supermarkets Ltd and Another [2022] EAT 143 starts by expressing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll