header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 8 October 2019

07 October 2019 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Features , Employment , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
This month, Ian Smith runs with some classic arguments on worker status & gives a nod to national stereotypes
  • No general right to holiday pay for all non-standard doctors.
  • Working time rights—the meaning of ‘refuse’.
  • The meek shall inherit, if not the world, at least a higher level of compensation.

There have been two employment-related cases featuring in the press recently which are considered here at the beginning and end of this brief. Other cases considered involved dismissal for refusing to work contrary to working time laws, timing as a factor in the definition of disability and injury to feelings damages in discrimination claims.

The first newsworthy case was the decision of Kerr J in Community Based Care Health Ltd v Narayan UKEAT/0162/18,the latest in a series of cases concerning whether doctors operating outside the classic GP surgery model can claim to be ‘workers’. The result (in the doctor’s favour) caused speculation in the press about potential costs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Legal director appointment bolsters public and regulatory team

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Firm appoints training partner and four new trainees

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Firm strengthens military claims team with senior associate hire

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll