header-logo header-logo

Employment tribunal fees on the horizon

21 December 2011
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

Workers could be charged up to £2,350 to bring an employment tribunal claim, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has announced.

An MoJ consultation, published last week, puts forward two options:

■ a fee of between £150-£250 to begin a claim, plus between £250-£1250 for a hearing, with no limit on the maximum award; or
■ a single fee of between £200-£600 where the maximum award is limited to £30,000, with the option of an additional fee of £1,750 where the claimant seeks an award above this amount.

Although claimants will pay the fees initially, the unsuccessful party will bear the cost of the fees. Fee waivers will be available in certain circumstances, for example, people on benefits couples whose income is less than £18,000, or couples with two children whose income is less than £23,860. The government will continue to fund Acas.

Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly said the proposals would save the taxpayer £84m.
Employment lawyer Esther Smith, partner at Thomas Eggar, says: “If a cost system is implemented, which I think it should, it must not deter people with genuine claims but no means to pay the fees. 

“In addition, care needs to be taken to ensure that the cost system implemented does not give rise to a new legal insurance industry, setting up whizzy schemes to fund people's claims for them out of future compensation. A fee structure related to the value of the claim being pursued would be a sensible starting point. It would also ensure that claimants confirmed the value of the claim they were pursuing early, and they would then be bound to stick to this, or a lower figure as the claim progressed.  

“This in itself should aid early settlement of claims, as all too often claims proceed to hearing on legal points, without the claimants or their representatives giving any real thought to the value of what they are arguing about. The structure of fees related to the stated value of the claim would also deter people from initially over valuing or over estimating their claim at the outset.”

The consultation, Charging Fees in Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal, ends on 6 March 2012 and the fees are due to be introduced after 2013-2014. There were 218,100 claims to employment tribunals in 2010-11, a 44%  increase on 2008-09.
 
 
 

Issue: 7495 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll