header-logo header-logo

Employment tribunals—at breaking point?

15 October 2021 / Jennifer Sole , Caspar Glynn KC
Issue: 7952 / Categories: Features , Profession , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail
60709
Jennifer Sole & Caspar Glyn QC explore the stark findings of the Employment Lawyers Association’s 2021 survey
  • ELA’s 2021 member survey has exposed a crumbling and chronically underfunded tribunal system which is beset by delays and a lack of staff.

Earlier this year, the Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) commissioned an online survey of its members, the results of which revealed that the country’s employment system is in crisis. ELA is an unaffiliated and non-political group of some 6,000 lawyers who practise in the field of employment law, comprising those who represent claimants and respondents/defendants in the employment tribunals and courts, and who advise both employees/workers and employers.

ELA’s 2021 survey was conducted this April and May, by a third-party consultancy. The survey included questions about member experiences with employment tribunals, the backlog of claims, remote hearings, and the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas). The sample obtained responses from around 25% of ELA’s membership of 6,000 employment lawyers. The full results of the survey can be found

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll