header-logo header-logo

Employment tribunals—at breaking point?

15 October 2021 / Jennifer Sole , Caspar Glynn KC
Issue: 7952 / Categories: Features , Profession , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail
60709
Jennifer Sole & Caspar Glyn QC explore the stark findings of the Employment Lawyers Association’s 2021 survey
  • ELA’s 2021 member survey has exposed a crumbling and chronically underfunded tribunal system which is beset by delays and a lack of staff.

Earlier this year, the Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) commissioned an online survey of its members, the results of which revealed that the country’s employment system is in crisis. ELA is an unaffiliated and non-political group of some 6,000 lawyers who practise in the field of employment law, comprising those who represent claimants and respondents/defendants in the employment tribunals and courts, and who advise both employees/workers and employers.

ELA’s 2021 survey was conducted this April and May, by a third-party consultancy. The survey included questions about member experiences with employment tribunals, the backlog of claims, remote hearings, and the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas). The sample obtained responses from around 25% of ELA’s membership of 6,000 employment lawyers. The full results of the survey can be found

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll