header-logo header-logo

15 October 2021 / Jennifer Sole , Caspar Glynn KC
Issue: 7952 / Categories: Features , Profession , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail

Employment tribunals—at breaking point?

60709
Jennifer Sole & Caspar Glyn QC explore the stark findings of the Employment Lawyers Association’s 2021 survey
  • ELA’s 2021 member survey has exposed a crumbling and chronically underfunded tribunal system which is beset by delays and a lack of staff.

Earlier this year, the Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) commissioned an online survey of its members, the results of which revealed that the country’s employment system is in crisis. ELA is an unaffiliated and non-political group of some 6,000 lawyers who practise in the field of employment law, comprising those who represent claimants and respondents/defendants in the employment tribunals and courts, and who advise both employees/workers and employers.

ELA’s 2021 survey was conducted this April and May, by a third-party consultancy. The survey included questions about member experiences with employment tribunals, the backlog of claims, remote hearings, and the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas). The sample obtained responses from around 25% of ELA’s membership of 6,000 employment lawyers. The full results of the survey can be found

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll