header-logo header-logo

Employment tribunals: proposals for change

02 July 2020 / Jagoda Klimowicz , Lisa Smith
Issue: 7893 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail
23522
Law Commission update: Jagoda Klimowicz & Lisa Smith discuss key recommendations for the employment law hearing structures

The Law Commission of England and Wales published its report on Employment Law Hearing Structures in April (https://go.aws/381N2dN). The report considers areas of shared and exclusive jurisdiction in employment law and aims to remove anomalies while increasing efficiency and access to justice. However, the report does not seek to propose any major re-structuring of the employment tribunal system (see ‘They’ve got it!’, Stephen Levinson, NLJ 15 May 2020). The report follows a consultation exercise which began in 2018. Its recommendations are based on analysis of 72 consultation responses, from sectors as varied as the judiciary, legal practitioners, non-governmental organisations, companies, academics, trade unions and individuals.

As the research assistant in the team that undertook the consultation analysis for the report and the lawyer leading the project, we are able to provide an in-depth look at the recommendations which may be of particular interest to practitioners.

Underlying

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Payne Hicks Beach—Craig Parrett

Payne Hicks Beach—Craig Parrett

Insolvency and restructuring practice welcomes new partner

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

North East firm welcomes employment specialist

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Partner joins commercial and technology practice

NEWS
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
With chronic underfunding and rising demand leaving thousands without legal help, technology could transform access to justice—if handled wisely, writes Professor Sue Prince of the University of Exeter in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll