header-logo header-logo

Employment tribunals: proposals for change

02 July 2020 / Jagoda Klimowicz , Lisa Smith
Issue: 7893 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail
23522
Law Commission update: Jagoda Klimowicz & Lisa Smith discuss key recommendations for the employment law hearing structures

The Law Commission of England and Wales published its report on Employment Law Hearing Structures in April (https://go.aws/381N2dN). The report considers areas of shared and exclusive jurisdiction in employment law and aims to remove anomalies while increasing efficiency and access to justice. However, the report does not seek to propose any major re-structuring of the employment tribunal system (see ‘They’ve got it!’, Stephen Levinson, NLJ 15 May 2020). The report follows a consultation exercise which began in 2018. Its recommendations are based on analysis of 72 consultation responses, from sectors as varied as the judiciary, legal practitioners, non-governmental organisations, companies, academics, trade unions and individuals.

As the research assistant in the team that undertook the consultation analysis for the report and the lawyer leading the project, we are able to provide an in-depth look at the recommendations which may be of particular interest to practitioners.

Underlying

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

mfg Solicitors—Philip Chapman

mfg Solicitors—Philip Chapman

Regional firm strengthens corporate team with partner hire

Switalskis—Sally Christey, Mathew Abiagom & Cyman Kaur

Switalskis—Sally Christey, Mathew Abiagom & Cyman Kaur

Commercial property team expands with trio of appointments

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll