header-logo header-logo

14 May 2020 / Stephen Levinson
Issue: 7886 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

They’ve got it!

20710
Stephen Levinson welcomes the Law Commission’s (excellent) report on Employment Law Hearing Structures

It is a pleasure to welcome this report. Dry though the subject matter may seem it deals with issues of real practical importance. The Law Commission has not previously reported on employment law. Generally, they avoid anything politically controversial so most of the substantive law is out of bounds. This report deals with the jurisdiction of tribunals, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), and the civil courts in employment matters. It does not review the current discussions about the possible restructuring of the employment law system. What it does is discuss all of the possible changes to the structure (‘Employment Law Hearing Structures: Report’, (Law Com No 390), April 2020, https://go.aws/3csG42K).

The first thing to welcome is that the Commission clearly understand the unique ethos and role of the employment tribunal, declare what it is, and make clear they wish it preserved. This distinguishes them from all governments over the last twenty years which have shown no such understanding.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll