header-logo header-logo

14 May 2020 / Stephen Levinson
Issue: 7886 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

They’ve got it!

20710
Stephen Levinson welcomes the Law Commission’s (excellent) report on Employment Law Hearing Structures

It is a pleasure to welcome this report. Dry though the subject matter may seem it deals with issues of real practical importance. The Law Commission has not previously reported on employment law. Generally, they avoid anything politically controversial so most of the substantive law is out of bounds. This report deals with the jurisdiction of tribunals, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), and the civil courts in employment matters. It does not review the current discussions about the possible restructuring of the employment law system. What it does is discuss all of the possible changes to the structure (‘Employment Law Hearing Structures: Report’, (Law Com No 390), April 2020, https://go.aws/3csG42K).

The first thing to welcome is that the Commission clearly understand the unique ethos and role of the employment tribunal, declare what it is, and make clear they wish it preserved. This distinguishes them from all governments over the last twenty years which have shown no such understanding.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll