header-logo header-logo

15 September 2011 / Hle Blog
Issue: 7481 / Categories: Blogs , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment vetting: an alternative solution?

HLE blogger Timothy Pitt-Payne QC presents his policy paper on employment vetting

"Getting the employment vetting system right is a challenge for both lawyers and politicians. Extremely difficult policy considerations are laden with legal complexities. Serious human consequences can arise from inadequacies and inequalities in the system.

The task is further complicated by an outmoded legal framework open to abuse by unscrupulous employers. This prevents a fair balance from being struck between the key policy concerns of individual fairness, rehabilitation and protection of the vulnerable.

The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (ROA 1974), on which the current legal structure is largely based, seeks to protect ex-offenders from having to disclose information about “spent convictions”. In this modern information age, however, unprincipled employers need only to employ “enforced subject access” or turn to the internet to search for details of past convictions.

Moreover, the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) system is a massive exception to ROA 1974, often allowing access to “soft intelligence”—information about allegations that have not led to a conviction and may

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll