header-logo header-logo

End of a century (Pt 2)

29 April 2016 / David Branson
Issue: 7696 / Categories: Features , Health & safety
printer mail-detail
nlj_7696_branson

In the second part of a two part series, David Branson reports on the end of a century old overlap between civil and criminal liability in health and safety

The first article in this series highlighted the end of the century old overlap between civil and criminal liability in health and safety following the implementation of s 69(3) of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (see “End of a century (Pt 1)”, NLJ, 25 March & 1 April 2016, p 10).

We should also note the impact of reg 21 of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999. This was introduced following the case of R v Nelson Group Services (Maintenance) Ltd [1999] IRLR 646, [1998] 4 All ER 331 where the employer was held not liable for the failings of his employees which had led to a breach of health and safety duties under the Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 1994 (SI 1994/1886). The employer had argued that the employees had failed to follow the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll