header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Opinion , Media , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

That English look

Geoffrey Bindman sheds some light on libel’s prince
of darkness

The stereotypical solicitor is a cautious, earnest and unobtrusive individual, a steady and reliable pillar of the community. The leading defamation practitioners were often cast in a different mould.

Peter Carter-Ruck on the surface fitted the conventional image. He looked the part. But beneath the urbane surface was a ruthless egotist. He was a formidable opponent. He particularly enjoyed suing Private Eye, who notoriously misspelt the second part of his surname.

Born in 1914, he was the most prominent libel lawyer in the country when I first acted for Private Eye in 1969. Following one of our early encounters he invited me for a drink at the Garrick. He seemed anxious to impress. He was a member of the Council of the Law Society and people talked of his Rolls-Royce and his country estate, the product of the enormous fees he demanded and usually got.

I soon discovered one of the ways he became rich. My usual response to claims

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll