header-logo header-logo

01 September 2025
Issue: 8129 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Planning , Local authority
printer mail-detail

Epping injunction overturned

Judges have lifted an interim injunction on asylum seekers being housed at the Bell Hotel, Epping, and held the Home Office and hotel owners can intervene in the case

Lord Justice Bean, sitting with Lady Justice Nicola Davies and Lord Justice Cobb, emphasised the appeal was not concerned with the merits of government policy regarding asylum seeker accommodation. They held the High Court judge, Mr Justice Eyre, erred by ignoring the consequence that the closure of one site means capacity has to be found elsewhere.

Bean LJ said the injunction ‘may incentivise’ other councils to follow suit, and the impact of ‘such ad-hoc applications was a material consideration… that was not considered by the judge’.

Epping Forest District Council successfully sought the injunction in August on the basis of a breach of planning laws. The hotel, which has housed asylum seekers since 2020, recently became the focus of protest after a man living in the hotel was charged with the sexual assault of a teenage girl.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll