header-logo header-logo

01 September 2025
Issue: 8129 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Planning , Local authority
printer mail-detail

Epping injunction overturned

Judges have lifted an interim injunction on asylum seekers being housed at the Bell Hotel, Epping, and held the Home Office and hotel owners can intervene in the case

Lord Justice Bean, sitting with Lady Justice Nicola Davies and Lord Justice Cobb, emphasised the appeal was not concerned with the merits of government policy regarding asylum seeker accommodation. They held the High Court judge, Mr Justice Eyre, erred by ignoring the consequence that the closure of one site means capacity has to be found elsewhere.

Bean LJ said the injunction ‘may incentivise’ other councils to follow suit, and the impact of ‘such ad-hoc applications was a material consideration… that was not considered by the judge’.

Epping Forest District Council successfully sought the injunction in August on the basis of a breach of planning laws. The hotel, which has housed asylum seekers since 2020, recently became the focus of protest after a man living in the hotel was charged with the sexual assault of a teenage girl.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll