header-logo header-logo

01 September 2025
Issue: 8129 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Planning , Local authority
printer mail-detail

Epping injunction overturned

Judges have lifted an interim injunction on asylum seekers being housed at the Bell Hotel, Epping, and held the Home Office and hotel owners can intervene in the case

Lord Justice Bean, sitting with Lady Justice Nicola Davies and Lord Justice Cobb, emphasised the appeal was not concerned with the merits of government policy regarding asylum seeker accommodation. They held the High Court judge, Mr Justice Eyre, erred by ignoring the consequence that the closure of one site means capacity has to be found elsewhere.

Bean LJ said the injunction ‘may incentivise’ other councils to follow suit, and the impact of ‘such ad-hoc applications was a material consideration… that was not considered by the judge’.

Epping Forest District Council successfully sought the injunction in August on the basis of a breach of planning laws. The hotel, which has housed asylum seekers since 2020, recently became the focus of protest after a man living in the hotel was charged with the sexual assault of a teenage girl.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll