header-logo header-logo

06 December 2007
Issue: 7300 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

EQUALITY MATTERS

In brief

Women have made great strides in the 85 years since the first female solicitor was admitted, says the Association of Women Solicitors chairwoman, Susha Chandrasekhar. However, she says it is dispiriting that issues plaguing early women solicitors, such as equal pay, are still faced by many women solicitors today. Speaking at a reception to mark the 85th anniversary of the admittance of the first woman solicitor—Carrie Morrison—Chandrasekhar said: “Women are no longer a small group on the sidelines—if trends continue, we will form the majority of the profession.” However, she added, men are almost twice as likely to become partners as women and women still earn less than men.

Issue: 7300 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll