header-logo header-logo

27 February 2026 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC
Issue: 8151 / Categories: Features , In Court , Constitutional law , Equality
printer mail-detail

Ethnicity, gender & territoriality in the Supreme Court

243391
Professor Graham Zellick KC on the assertion that there is a ‘Welsh seat’ on the UK Supreme Court
  • Despite claims of a so-called ‘Welsh seat’ on the UK Supreme Court, there is no statutory requirement for a Welsh justice: under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, ‘England and Wales’ are treated as a single legal jurisdiction.
  • Although Wales has developed a stronger legal identity in recent years, Welsh cases form only a small proportion of the Supreme Court’s workload and there is currently no distinct Welsh legal system comparable to Scotland or Northern Ireland, so no Welsh seat exists in law or convention.

Enter ‘Jewish seat’ in a search engine and up will pop a number of items describing the so-called ‘Jewish seat’ on the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), a custom which began in 1916 with the appointment of Louis Brandeis. He was followed by a number of other Jewish lawyers, such as Benjamin Cardozo and Felix Frankfurter, who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll