header-logo header-logo

27 February 2026 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC FAcSS
Issue: 8151 / Categories: Features , In Court , Constitutional law , Equality
printer mail-detail

Ethnicity, gender & territoriality in the Supreme Court

243391
Professor Graham Zellick KC on the assertion that there is a ‘Welsh seat’ on the UK Supreme Court
  • Despite claims of a so-called ‘Welsh seat’ on the UK Supreme Court, there is no statutory requirement for a Welsh justice: under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, ‘England and Wales’ are treated as a single legal jurisdiction.
  • Although Wales has developed a stronger legal identity in recent years, Welsh cases form only a small proportion of the Supreme Court’s workload and there is currently no distinct Welsh legal system comparable to Scotland or Northern Ireland, so no Welsh seat exists in law or convention.

Enter ‘Jewish seat’ in a search engine and up will pop a number of items describing the so-called ‘Jewish seat’ on the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), a custom which began in 1916 with the appointment of Louis Brandeis. He was followed by a number of other Jewish lawyers, such as Benjamin Cardozo and Felix Frankfurter,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll