header-logo header-logo

27 February 2026 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC FAcSS
Issue: 8151 / Categories: Features , In Court , Constitutional law , Equality
printer mail-detail

Ethnicity, gender & territoriality in the Supreme Court

243391
Professor Graham Zellick KC on the assertion that there is a ‘Welsh seat’ on the UK Supreme Court
  • Despite claims of a so-called ‘Welsh seat’ on the UK Supreme Court, there is no statutory requirement for a Welsh justice: under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, ‘England and Wales’ are treated as a single legal jurisdiction.
  • Although Wales has developed a stronger legal identity in recent years, Welsh cases form only a small proportion of the Supreme Court’s workload and there is currently no distinct Welsh legal system comparable to Scotland or Northern Ireland, so no Welsh seat exists in law or convention.

Enter ‘Jewish seat’ in a search engine and up will pop a number of items describing the so-called ‘Jewish seat’ on the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), a custom which began in 1916 with the appointment of Louis Brandeis. He was followed by a number of other Jewish lawyers, such as Benjamin Cardozo and Felix Frankfurter,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
FIFA’s 2026 Men's World Cup is already mired in controversy, with complaints over ‘excessive prices’ and opaque ticketing. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys warns that governing bodies may face scrutiny under EU competition law, with allegations of a ‘dominant—if not monopolistic—position’ in ticket sales
Ten years after Brexit, UK and EU trade mark regimes are drifting apart in practice if not principle. Writing in NLJ this week, Roger Lush and Lara Elder of Carpmaels & Ransford highlight tighter UK scrutiny after SkyKick, where overly broad filings may signal ‘bad faith’
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
back-to-top-scroll