header-logo header-logo

27 February 2026 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC FAcSS
Issue: 8151 / Categories: Features , In Court , Constitutional law , Equality
printer mail-detail

Ethnicity, gender & territoriality in the Supreme Court

243391
Professor Graham Zellick KC on the assertion that there is a ‘Welsh seat’ on the UK Supreme Court
  • Despite claims of a so-called ‘Welsh seat’ on the UK Supreme Court, there is no statutory requirement for a Welsh justice: under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, ‘England and Wales’ are treated as a single legal jurisdiction.
  • Although Wales has developed a stronger legal identity in recent years, Welsh cases form only a small proportion of the Supreme Court’s workload and there is currently no distinct Welsh legal system comparable to Scotland or Northern Ireland, so no Welsh seat exists in law or convention.

Enter ‘Jewish seat’ in a search engine and up will pop a number of items describing the so-called ‘Jewish seat’ on the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), a custom which began in 1916 with the appointment of Louis Brandeis. He was followed by a number of other Jewish lawyers, such as Benjamin Cardozo and Felix Frankfurter,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll