header-logo header-logo

12 May 2011
Issue: 7465 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Evidence

A&E Television Networks LLC and another company v Discovery Communications Europe Ltd [2011] EWHC 1038 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 34 (May)

Survey evidence was invariably expensive, time-consuming and quite often not particularly probative because of the manner in which it had been conducted, the questions asked or both. Accordingly, as a matter of practice the courts had required leave to be sought before such evidence was adduced. On such applications, the court was doing the following:
 
(i) so far as a party was going to seek to put expert evidence before the court, the court was exercising its power to control the amount and nature of expert evidence in order to make sure the expert evidence was proper evidence, admissible, and proportionate;

(ii) so far as a party sought to put in the actual answers to questions, the court was ensuring that the evidence was admissible and probative;

(iii) so far as the court was controlling the calling of live witnesses obtained as a result of some form of survey evidence, it was again ensuring that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll