header-logo header-logo

26 February 2010 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Executive decision

The General Council of the Bar has publicised the possibility of litigation against the government and the Legal Services Commission.

The General Council of the Bar has publicised the possibility of litigation against the government and the Legal Services Commission. It complains of a lack of consultation and co-ordination in relation to proposed changes to the graduated fee and very high cost cases schemes.

The potential case echoes an earlier success of the Bar Council in the mid-1980s when its chairman was Lord Alexander of Weedon QC. Lord Hailsham folded when faced with a writ arguing that the then proposed level of remuneration was not consistent with the statutory provisions then current. The lord chancellor had, however, the last laugh: he abolished the statutory provisions and reinstated the cuts.

The Bar is making the most of its case. On 5 February, it announced that it was instructing solicitors. On 10 February, its solicitors wrote to Lord Bach and Sir Bill Callaghan “in order to advance proceedings”. We are promised “a full pre-action letter” shortly. We

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll