header-logo header-logo

26 February 2010 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Executive decision

The General Council of the Bar has publicised the possibility of litigation against the government and the Legal Services Commission.

The General Council of the Bar has publicised the possibility of litigation against the government and the Legal Services Commission. It complains of a lack of consultation and co-ordination in relation to proposed changes to the graduated fee and very high cost cases schemes.

The potential case echoes an earlier success of the Bar Council in the mid-1980s when its chairman was Lord Alexander of Weedon QC. Lord Hailsham folded when faced with a writ arguing that the then proposed level of remuneration was not consistent with the statutory provisions then current. The lord chancellor had, however, the last laugh: he abolished the statutory provisions and reinstated the cuts.

The Bar is making the most of its case. On 5 February, it announced that it was instructing solicitors. On 10 February, its solicitors wrote to Lord Bach and Sir Bill Callaghan “in order to advance proceedings”. We are promised “a full pre-action letter” shortly. We

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll