header-logo header-logo

26 February 2010 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Executive decision

The General Council of the Bar has publicised the possibility of litigation against the government and the Legal Services Commission.

The General Council of the Bar has publicised the possibility of litigation against the government and the Legal Services Commission. It complains of a lack of consultation and co-ordination in relation to proposed changes to the graduated fee and very high cost cases schemes.

The potential case echoes an earlier success of the Bar Council in the mid-1980s when its chairman was Lord Alexander of Weedon QC. Lord Hailsham folded when faced with a writ arguing that the then proposed level of remuneration was not consistent with the statutory provisions then current. The lord chancellor had, however, the last laugh: he abolished the statutory provisions and reinstated the cuts.

The Bar is making the most of its case. On 5 February, it announced that it was instructing solicitors. On 10 February, its solicitors wrote to Lord Bach and Sir Bill Callaghan “in order to advance proceedings”. We are promised “a full pre-action letter” shortly. We

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Irwin Mitchell—Louisa Donaghy

Irwin Mitchell—Louisa Donaghy

National military team expands in Leeds with legal director appointment

Taylor Wessing—Jamie Humphreys

Taylor Wessing—Jamie Humphreys

Disputes and investigations team welcomes product liability partner hire

Spector Constant & Williams—Michael Michaeloudis and team

Spector Constant & Williams—Michael Michaeloudis and team

London firm launches employment department with four-lawyer team hire

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll