header-logo header-logo

21 July 2023 / Mark Solon
Issue: 8034 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Expert witness: getting your ducks in a row

131255
Mark Solon stresses the importance of experts knowing & following the rules
  • The judgment in M v F and another has underscored the importance of an expert witness being well-versed in the rules and guidance governing the presentation of expert evidence.

The 2022 family law case of M v F and another [2022] EWFC 186 has recently been published as a delayed judgment due to a subsequent hearing on expert anonymity. Although a family law matter, the principles dealt with apply to other areas of law.

There are two skill sets required of an expert: first, having the qualifications and experience relevant to the issues of a particular matter; but second, the skills needed to be an expert witness, including how to construct a court complaint report, a knowledge of the court rules, guidance, and protocols and how to give effective oral evidence. Instructing solicitors need to ensure an expert has these essential skills.

Recorder Reed’s judgment is a must-read for all expert witnesses and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll