header-logo header-logo

11 August 2017 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

The expert witness road: ensuring a happy ending

How to make your expert love you, by Mark Solon

Expert evidence is often a vital ingredient in proving or defending a case. If producing that evidence goes wrong in any serious way, it can have a significant impact on the outcome of the case or on the client’s liability for costs. Getting on with your expert witness is essential. Although an expert’s duty is to the court, the relationship with the instructing solicitor is key to quality evidence.

Perhaps we should first look at the main problems solicitors might encounter with experts. These include experts who:

  • accept instructions outside their expertise;
  • accept instructions when they have a conflict of interest or are not independent;
  • fail to produce a report on time or at all;
  • produce deficient advice or a report which: does not comply with the CPR requirements or court directions; does not comply with the instructions; is inadequately researched; is inaccurate in material respects; covers matters outside the expert’s expertise; is inconsistent or illogical; or relies upon untested
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll