header-logo header-logo

The expert witness road: ensuring a happy ending

11 August 2017 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

How to make your expert love you, by Mark Solon

Expert evidence is often a vital ingredient in proving or defending a case. If producing that evidence goes wrong in any serious way, it can have a significant impact on the outcome of the case or on the client’s liability for costs. Getting on with your expert witness is essential. Although an expert’s duty is to the court, the relationship with the instructing solicitor is key to quality evidence.

Perhaps we should first look at the main problems solicitors might encounter with experts. These include experts who:

  • accept instructions outside their expertise;
  • accept instructions when they have a conflict of interest or are not independent;
  • fail to produce a report on time or at all;
  • produce deficient advice or a report which: does not comply with the CPR requirements or court directions; does not comply with the instructions; is inadequately researched; is inaccurate in material respects; covers matters outside the expert’s expertise; is inconsistent or illogical; or relies upon untested
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll