header-logo header-logo

11 August 2011 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Expertly done?

Mark Solon ponders over the problems with experts

The main problems solicitors and their clients might encounter with experts and their evidence concern experts who:

  • accept instructions outside their expertise, or accept instructions when they have a conflict of interest, or are not independent;
  • produce deficient advice or a report which: does not comply with the CPR requirements or court directions; does not comply with the instructions; is inadequately researched; is inaccurate in material respects; covers matters outside the expert’s expertise; is inconsistent or illogical; relies upon untested theories; or fails to produce a report on time or at all;
  • overcharge, eg by increasing the report fee, hourly rate, attendance at court fee or cancellation fee without discussion or justification, or by charging for disbursements or expenses which were not authorised;
  • fail to be objective or display bias in a report, or when giving oral evidence;
  • act inefficiently or unco-operatively with regard to follow-up work to the report—written questions, experts’ discussion, etc;
  • do not co-operate about availability for trial when oral evidence is necessary,
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll